[sr-dev] RTPproxy docs - force socket

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Sat Dec 8 09:21:49 CET 2012


Better, it has to be moved to nathelper module docs, because is missing 
from there (it was when the two were one module).

Cheers,
Daniel

On 12/8/12 12:39 AM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> Yes, it should be removed. I think it's a left over from a long long time.
>
> -ovidiu
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Olle E. Johansson <oej at edvina.net> wrote:
>> 7 dec 2012 kl. 23:49 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> On 12/7/12 11:08 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>>>> http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.3.x/modules/rtpproxy.html#id2531640
>>>>
>>>> The modparam force_socket that is in the documentation for 3.3.x doesn't seem to exist in the source code any longer.
>>>>
>>>> The source says:
>>>> "* 2004-10-10   force_socket option introduced (jiri)"
>>>>
>>>> That's all I find about it - no comment about it being removed.
>>>>
>>>> The same comment exists in modules_k/nathelper.c where the function exists. Seems like the rtpproxy module has a shared history with nathalper :-)
>>> rtpproxy module was split from nathelper (till few versions ago they were same module, iirc, Ovidiu Sas did it).
>>>
>>>> I think it's safe to remove force_socket from the rtpproxy documentation. Anyone against?
>>> It has to be in the docs of nathelper module, and looking quickly at the code, it the socket to be used for sending nat ping keepalives.
>> I parse you that it can safely be removed from the rtpproxy docs then.
>>
>> Ovidiu? What's your opinion?
>>
>> /O

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda




More information about the sr-dev mailing list