[sr-dev] kamailio vs.ser

[Andrew Mortensen]

On Dec 3, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Ovidiu Sas <osas at voipembedded.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> By inspecting the source code, the only difference that I could see
> between kamailio and ser flavours is that kamailio has support for the
> "tm:local-request".
> Are there any constrains in having the tm:local-request present for ser flavour?
> Does it make sense to continue to build two flavours?
> My suggestion would be to focus one one single flavour and go forward
> with it for the next release.

I'm in favor of that. I've actually modified the source to use tm:local-request with the ser flavour quite a bit in testing. I haven't run into any problems, though my testing was far from comprehensive.

andrew