[sr-dev] RFC 5626 (Outbound) planned?

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello all,

there is some implementation towards these extensions done by SER folks 
in the past (quite some long time ago, when gruu was a draft), some 
notes in the readme:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_s/registrar.html#sip.instance

Now, I don't how much the specs in the draft were changed by the time of 
becoming rfc (I haven't read neither these drafts nor rfcs). The 
inconvenience is that we have two implementations for usrloc/registrar 
at this moment, but for next release (i mean 3.3) could be a nice task 
and pleasant work for the volunteers here to merge the two 
implementations and update with outbound/gruu. Just announce it when the 
works starts so there is no duplicated effort :-)

To answer to the initial question, this rfc (in the subject) is not in 
my todo, but that may change before 3.3 (decision to be made when I have 
time to read the rfcs and can assert properly usability), although I 
hope it will not be the case to code it myself because someone else will 
do it...

Cheers,
Daniel

On 10/10/11 10:36 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2011/10/10 Alfred E. Heggestad<aeh at db.org>:
>> what is the relationship between gruu and outbound ? GRUU (RFC 5627)
>> has a normative reference to Outbound (RFC 5626), probably because of
>> +sip.instance. Outbound has an informative reference to GRUU spec.
> IMHO Outbound is a real need (since NAT and TCP clients do exist),
> while GRUU is a cool feature, but not a requirement for the core
> protocol.
>

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda