[sr-dev] RFC 5626 (Outbound) planned?

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

2011/10/10 Henning Westerholt <hw at kamailio.org>:
>> Some other collateral changes needed for the above to work properly:
>>
>> - 430 status code MUST have less priority than any other 4XX response
>> since such 430 response can only be replied by edge proxies and means
>> "the TCP/TLS connection with the user is closed".
>
> What about the 439 code, i guess we need support in the server for this as
> well?

Yes. But IMHO it's not so interesting as it would just occur in case
the proxy between client and registrar does not support RFC 5626 (and
I suppose that both servers would always be provided and configured by
the same admin).

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc at aliax.net>