[sr-dev] build fail on ARM

[kasip at elektromaniak.wz.cz]

At 05.05.2011 v 21:25:56, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul <andrei at iptel.org> wrote:

All requested output are in the attachment (3.3kb, I hope that's fine) or
alternativaly at http://elektromaniak.wz.cz/info.tar.gz

I hope the config.mak is configured.. it should be.

Someone else asked me to build a kamailio 1.5 brach...  result: fails around
atomic locks too
By the way: the device I have is called "pandaboard".

Thanks for such quick reply
MMlosh

> On May 04, 2011 at 22:19, kasip at elektromaniak.wz.cz
> <kasip at elektromaniak.wz.cz> wrote:
> > Hi!
> > I once sent this message as a non-member and it was probably never looked
> on.
> > 
> > I tried to compile kamailio on ARM A9  (omap4430) natively and failed with
> > these errors
> 
> Could you please send more info?
> uname -m
> uname -a
> gcc --version
> gcc -dM -E -x c  /dev/null
> 
> and the generated config.mak (after make cfg).
> 
> The problem are the atomic_get_and_set_* instructions which use swp
>  (not supported on ARMv7+). However they are easy to replace with 
>  a ldrex/strex (one need only to replace the ATOMIC_XCHG_DECL macro
>  in atomic_arm with a modified version of the ATOMIC_CMPXCHG_DECL
>  macro).
> To enable proper SMP support we need also to define some memory
> barriers.
> 
> However since I don't have access to an ARMv7+, I need the above info
> from your machine so that I can modify the Maekfiles to properly detect
> a ARMv7.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrei
> 
> > CC (gcc) [kamailio]             atomic_ops.o
> > ./tmp/ccm1k5em.s: Assembler messages:
> > /tmp/ccm1k5em.s:35: Error: selected processor does not support Thumb mode
> `swp
> > r4,r8,[r6]'
> > /tmp/ccm1k5em.s:46: Error: selected processor does not support Thumb mode
> `swp
> > r4,r8,[r6]'
> > /tmp/ccm1k5em.s:191: Error: selected processor does not support Thumb mode
> `swp
> > r4,r9,[r7]'
> > /tmp/ccm1k5em.s:204: Error: selected processor does not support Thumb mode
> `swp
> > r4,r9,[r7]'
> > make: *** [atomic_ops.o] Error 1
> > 
> > ALTERNATIVELY
> > I have found openser 1.3.2-3 in debian lenny for armel achitecture.
> > Is this version secure enough? (I mean - has no some remote code execution
> / db
> > corruption bugs which are fixed in current kamailio version?)
> > I don't care about call authenticity or bookkeeping or protecting the
> uplink
> > (because there is none)
> > If it only lacks features, then it would be enough.
> > 
> > Thanks for reply.
> > MMlosh
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > sr-dev mailing list
> > sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>