[sr-dev] async module -- workers

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

On 6/26/11 10:15 PM, Matthew Williams wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am I correct that t_continue continues processing in the process that 
> calls it? If so, would it make sense for the async module to have an 
> api for other asynchronous modules to hand off to its worker pool 
> before calling t_continue? Or would it be better for each module to 
> have its own pool of workers?
right now the workers in async module are dummy timers to handle async 
delayed execution of next actions or specific route block. But there can 
be coded a single pool of workers and timers for async processing, might 
be a better solution overall.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda