[sr-dev] TLS: Sip-Routers adds a Record-Route with "sip" scheme rather than "sips"

[Klaus Darilion]

Am 05.07.2011 19:04, schrieb Iñaki Baz Castillo:
> 2011/7/5 Jan Janak <jan at ryngle.com>:
>> > So what is the difference then? How is a Route header with sips scheme
>> > different from a Route header with the transport=tls parameter? Is the
>> > proxy server supposed to treat Route headers with sips differently
>> > than Route headers with sip;transport=tls?
> No, the only difference is that transport=tls is deprecated and
> """"maybe"""" some devices don't understand ;transport=tls.

I just wonder why it is deprecated at all? IIRC "sips:" does not mandate
any protocol, just that encryption must be used. Thus, plain TCP over
IPsec would also fulfill "sips:", but for sure is different than TLS+TCP.

regards
Klaus