[sr-dev] RLS/PUA concurrency issue

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Mon Aug 1 13:40:38 CEST 2011



Am 01.08.2011 12:28, schrieb Andrew Miller:
> I attempted to insert a dialog entry in the hash table on sending the
> SUBSCRIBE, unfortunately this did not cure the problem
> 
> Has anyone any suggestions for the cleanest and easiest method to ensure
> that the 200 is handled before the NOTIFY?

The cleanest solution would be to establish the dialog when the NOTIFY
is received although the 200 OK is missing.

The NOTIFY can be seen as an implicit 200 OK.

regards
Klaus



More information about the sr-dev mailing list