[sr-dev] sl_send_reply in failure_route

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

2010/10/5 Olle E. Johansson <oej at edvina.net>:
>> It must be an error in the documentation. When entering in
>> failure_route this implies that the transaction does exist, so
>> sl_send_reply() is not valid.
>>
> Hmm. I am not sure you are right here. You enter the failure_route when a transaction fails, but it still exists.

I mean the incoming transaction (that created upon receipt of the
INVITE). t_relay is executed (the transaction is created). When
entering in failure_route that transaction obviously exists (we
haven't sent a final reply to the caller yet) so using sl_send_reply
is invalid (it can be used just in case the transaction hasn't be
created).



> You can retrigger it with new branches.

Yes, but it has nothing to do with the incoming transaction which is unique.


> Or has it ceased to exist so you simply create a new transaction?

The incoming transaction exists until a final response is sent by
kamailio to the client. Outgoing transactions (branches) exist until
kamailio receives a final reply for each one.






-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc at aliax.net>