[sr-dev] route names

[Alex Balashov]

Are PV mathematical expressions evaluated in lexical argument scope of  
routines that accept a route name?

In other words, maybe it's a problem because

     route($(avp(s:port)+1));

or something like that may also have some meaning?

--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
1170 Peachtree Street
12th Floor, Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892

On May 5, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Juha Heinanen <jh at tutpro.com> wrote:

> i tried to define route
>
> route [+358] { ... }
>
> but got syntax error.  is there a good reason why + is not allowed in
> name of route?
>
> -- juha
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev