[sr-dev] Why is any bflag visible under failure_route?

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

2010/3/26 Juha Heinanen <jh at tutpro.com>:
> I aki Baz Castillo writes:
>
>  > So IMHO my question was originally wrong as no bflag should be
>  > inspected in failure_route (undefined result when doing it).
>
> i have been using a non-branch flag as GW_ALIVE flag, which i set in
> on_reply route if i get a provisional reply from the next gw and it has
> worked fine.

Yes, using a transaction flag (rather than flag) even in
on_reply_route (for a branch) is valid and correct.
My point was exactly the opposite.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc at aliax.net>