[sr-dev] Delayed branches?

[Klaus Darilion]

Just to be sure what you want: You want to start another branch, but 
keep the original branch still alive - thus a mixture of parallel and 
sequential forking (I would call it delayed parallel forking).

Nice idea. I think there are currently no means to accomplish that.

regards
Klaus


Am 30.06.2010 14:34, schrieb Jasmin Schnatterbeck:
> Hello list,
>
> for a few weeks now I am thinking about the idea of something like
> "delayed branches".
>
> For example if one INVITE lookup results in 2 contacts/branches, then
> the first branch should be executed directly but the second should
> experience a delay of some seconds, until the INVITE is being sent out
> to the 2nd contact.
>
> Such a feature would be really useful for users, if they would like to
> configure their delayed redirects server-side and not client-side
> (devices).
>
> I have some doubts, whether it's reasonable in general, if a sip proxy
> behaves like this (delays requests...) - what do you think?
>
> Best Regards
> Jasmin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev