[sr-dev] textops module comparison

[Juha Heinanen]

in the irc meeting, i promised to study, if/how textops modules could be
merged.  below is a comparison.  if ? appears as arg, it means that the
function has not been documented in README.

perhaps the easiest thing to do would be to extract the selects from
modules_s/textops to a new modules/sel.

comments?

-- juha

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

				s	k

search(re)			x       x
search_body(re)				x
search_append(re, txt)  	x       x
search_append_body(re, txt)	        x
replace(re, txt)       		x	x
replace_body(re, txt)			x
replace_all(re, txt)		x	x
replace_body_all(re, txt)		x
replace_body_atonce(re, txt)		x
subst('/re/repl/flags')		x	x
subst_uri('/re/repl/flags')	x	x
subst_user('/re/repl/flags')	x	x
subst_body('/re/repl/flags')		x
set_body(txt,content_type)		x
set_reply_body(txt,content_type)	x
filter_body(content_type)		x
append_to_reply(txt)		x	x
append_hf(txt)			x	x
append_hf(txt, hdr)			x
append_hf_value(?, ?)		x
insert_hf(txt) 				x
insert_hf(txt, hdr)			x
insert_hf_value(?, ?)		x
remove_hf(hname)		x	x
remove_hf_re(re)		x	x
remove_hf_value(?)		x
remove_hf_value2(?)		x
assign_hf_value(?, ?)		x
assign_hf_value2(?, ?)		x
include_hf_value(?, ?)		x
exclude_hf_value(?, ?)		x
hf_value_exists(?, ?)
append_urihf(prefix, suffix)	x	x
is_present_hf(hf_name)		x	x
is_present_hf_re(hf_name_re)		x
append_time()			x	x
is_method(name)				x
has_body(), has_body(mime)		x
is_privacy(privacy_type)		x
cmp_str(str1, str2)			x
cmp_istr(str1, str2)			x
starts_with(str1, str2)			x
msg_apply_changes()			x
selects				x