[sr-dev] More about locally generated 408

[Juha Heinanen]

Henning Westerholt writes:

 > hm, i'd opt to keep the 408 here. What about setting a flag if you
 > received a provisional response in reply_route, and then check this
 > in your failure_route when you process the 408? We do it this way,
 > and did not found any problems so far. I think Juha also proposed
 > something like this earlier.

yes, that is what i proposed and have been using myself for years.  i
don't see any need to make changes in tm for this.

-- juha