[sr-dev] pv module

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 20.10.2009 21:48 Uhr, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2009 at 22:10, Juha Heinanen <jh at tutpro.com> wrote:
>   
>> Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
>>
>>  > We are in freeze and this would complicate merges from master to sr_3.0
>>  > a little (unless we want to propagate the change in sr_3.0 which I
>>  > don't think it's a good idea at this point).
>>
>> i meant that the move is done in sr_3.0, not in master and then
>> propagated from sr_3.0 to master.
>>     
>
> Well, it might break packaging scripts and who knows what else.
> I personally have nothing against moving it, but everybody working on
> sr_3.0 or k3.0 should agree (it won't be nice to break packaging on k3.0
>  the next time it is merged from sr_3.0).
>   

I think will complicate the life right now for something that does not 
bring a major benefit, considering we are in freeze state. It is a long 
debate to start right now. Next release that should be a better 
integrated one, hopefully with some modules merged (sl, rr, and some 
other like them) will take care of having unique modules moved.

Therefore I prefer that sr_3.0 and k_3.0 stay in this state.

Cheers,
Daniel
 

>>  > Apart from that IMHO k developer should decide if pv is ready/should be
>>  > moved.
>>
>> yes, if developer is still around.
>>
>>     
>
> Andrei
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>   

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
* Kamailio SIP Masterclass, Nov 9-13, 2009, Berlin
* http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-masterclass/