[sr-dev] alias_contact()/handle_alias() ready for testing

[Klaus Darilion]

Juha Heinanen schrieb:
> Klaus Darilion writes:
> 
>  > ok. depends in your NAT-traversal approach. In my pragmatic approach I 
>  > do NAT traversal anyway for all local users, thus it would work for me.
>  > 
>  > If you have a more advanced NAT traversal approach, probably you need a 
>  > second bflag which will is activated either by NAT or TCP.
> 
> klaus,
> 
> i don't use mediaproxy if is not needed.  the example implementation
> already takes care of what you suggest:

but shouldn't that be extended to detect of contact of response needs to 
be converted?

> route [REGISTER_REQUESTS] {
>     ...
>     if (isflagset(FROM_NATED) || (proto == TCP)) {
>         fix_nated_register();
> 	if (isflagset(FROM_NATED)) {
> 	    setbflag("TO_NATED");
> 	};

  	if (proto == TCP) {
  	    setbflag("TO_TCP");
  	};

>     };
>     save("location");



and after lookup() in branch route:

  	if (isbflagset(TO_TCP) || isbflagset(TO_NATED)) {
  	    t_on_reply(REWRITE_RESPONSE_CONTACT);
  	};

regards
klaus