[sr-dev] alias_contact()/handle_alias() ready for testing

[Klaus Darilion]

Juha Heinanen schrieb:
> Klaus Darilion writes:
> 
>  > I think the "reply" problem needs to be solved using the registrar NAT 
>  > bflag. If NAT flag is set for callee, activate a reply-route with 
>  > add_alias() (can be done per branch).
> 
> that is not correct, because add_alias() needs to be called even when
> reply comes from a tcp ua that is not behind nat.

ok. depends in your NAT-traversal approach. In my pragmatic approach I 
do NAT traversal anyway for all local users, thus it would work for me.

If you have a more advanced NAT traversal approach, probably you need a 
second bflag which will is activated either by NAT or TCP.

regards
klaus