[sr-dev] i: and s: avp syntax

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 05/30/2009 11:48 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>  > hmm, here is a conflict between S and K I just realized now:
>  > - avp name without i: or s: is considered to be string in S and avp 
>  > alias in K
>
> what is the need for avp aliases if names are always strings?
>   
they are not always strings. As far as I could get it, SR has the old style:
- s: ... - string
- i: ... - int
- no s: or i: - string
- $... - avp alias

In K is:
s: ... - string
- i: ... - int
- no s: or i: - avp alias

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/