[SR-Dev] [Kamailio-Devel] new module: memcached

Henning Westerholt henning.westerholt at 1und1.de
Thu Mar 12 18:26:15 CET 2009


On Wednesday 11 March 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> Hi, I read this in the documentation:
>
> -----------
> This module is an addition to the existing htable functionality, not a
> replacement. In smaller architectures or installations where only one
> instance needs access to the hash table this module is easier to setup, as
> no dedicated server needs to be provided. But when a distributed storage
> facilility is necessary, or one want to separate the storage from the SIP
> server, this module could be used.
> ------------
>
> Perhaps you could clarify in which case is better using htable or
> memcached? I understand that htable (not distributed but in local memory)
> is more suitable for a simple installation while memcached allow varios
> servers accessing to the same storege.
>
> If I'm right, sould the text be a bit improved? :)

Hi Iñaki,

thanks. Yes, you're right, this text could be improved. :-) I'll rephrase it a 
bit.

Cheers,

Henning



More information about the sr-dev mailing list