[sr-dev] build problems: ser's osp module

[Di-Shi Sun]

Hi Klaus,

All SER applications (SER, Kamailio and OpenSIPS) should use the same OSP 
module in theory. There are some difference either because of the update 
schedule or resource. You may keep the OSP module in Kamailio because it is 
newer than the OSP module in SER.

Thanks,

Di-Shi Sun.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>
To: <di-shi at transnexus.com>
Cc: "sr-dev" <sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:13 AM
Subject: Re: [sr-dev] build problems: ser's osp module


> Hi Di-Shi!
>
> We are in the process of merging Kamailio modules with ser modules 
> (sip-router.org). We wonder what is the difference of the OSP module in 
> ser and Kamailio.
>
> Is there a reason why we should keep both modules? Or are they identical 
> so we can remove one of them?
>
> thanks
> Klaus
>
>
>
> Jan Janak wrote:
>> On 01-07 15:29, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>>
>>> Jan Janak schrieb:
>>>> On 29-06 23:22, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>> in ser's osp module Makefile these condition should be adopted to 
>>>>> search  in /usr/lib too:
>>>>>
>>>>> LIBS=$(shell if [ -f /usr/local/lib/libosptk.a ]; then echo "-losptk" 
>>>>> ;  else echo "-losp" ; fi)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Or make it like K's osp module: use always -losptk
>>>> What is the difference between osptk and osp library? Why is this 
>>>> needed?
>>> Probably it is the same. In Debian it osp library is called osptk (tool 
>>> kit?)
>>
>> Ohh, I see, I had not idea it was already included in debian. In that 
>> case I
>> suggest that we hardwire the Makefile to osptk, if nobody disagrees?
>>
>>   Jan.
>
>