[sr-dev] AVPs in replies?

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 12/10/09 2:20 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>   >  :-) -- I was saying, that by default, neither S nor K lock for reply
>   >  processing. Now you want to make that default behavior.
>
> which in sr may lead to crash and needs to be fixed by adding the
> locking.  in k there is not that problem, because if you choose per
> transaction mode (which is the only mode that sr has), you get locking
> on by default.
>
> so the issue is fixing the only mode that sr has.  if you want another
> mode, then someone has to add it write the code and add to sr.
>
>    
and that is done by adding the mode (no matter is going to be per 
transaction or global). So you get to K style (more or less) and now is 
the matter of what should be the default -- locking or not for replies 
-- and I said that none had locking by default so far.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
* http://www.asipto.com/