[sr-dev] AVPs in replies?

[Juha Heinanen]

Klaus Darilion writes:
 > Juha Heinanen wrote:
 > > Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
 > > 
 > >  > > K's tm module can be configured to have transaction AVPs or message AVPs:
 > >  > > http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.5.x/tm#id2530480
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > What is the behaviour of ser's tm module? I need AVPs in reply route - 
 > >  > > is it supported?
 > >  > 
 > >  > In theory, yes by default. In practice it looks like there's a bug if
 > >  > several replies are processed in the same time.
 > >  > As a quick fix for sr_3.0 I might introduce the same mechanism as in k.
 > > 
 > > i didn't quite get this.  in sr_3.0, i do see avps in onrely_route that
 > > were set in route block before t_relay was called.  is this what andrei
 > > means in above by default behavior?  if so that is fine with me.
 > 
 > Yes. So sr has a different default behavior than k. (should be 
 > documented in migration guide)

what is the conclusion about this?

it is ok with me if in in sr_3.0 onreply_avp_mode is on by default
(and even on always), but i'm very worried, if it does not work when
several replies are processed simultaneously.

-- juha