[SR-Dev] DB decisions

[Klaus Darilion]

Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2008 at 04:34, Jan Janak <jan at iptel.org> wrote:
> [...]
> 
>>   Unless nobody objects, I would suggest we do the following:
>>
>>   1) Convert both API versions into libraries. Here I would suggest some
>>      simpler name, sr_dbk sounds is cryptic, how about using just db1 and db2
>> 	 possibly prefixed with sr (libsrdb1, libsrdb2)?
> 
> Do we go for libsrdb[12] or somebody has a better ideea?

what about db (for ser's DB) and dbk for K's?

klaus

> 
> Do I keep the kamailio db history or we use directly Jan's version (no
> history)?
> 
> 
>>   2) Rename conflicting identifiers in both libraries, i.e. db_con1, db_con2,
>>      db_res1, db_res2.
> 
> I think we would have to rename the DB_* macros too:
> DB1_STR DB1_INT DB1_BLOB DB1_BIGINT DB1_DOUBLE DB1_STRING DB1_DATETIME
> DB1_BITMAP
> 
> From my point of view it's ok as long as we can write a script that
> would convert a module automatically (and all these are just simple
>  search & replace).
> 
>>   2) Merge database drivers from both projects. Here I would suggest we
>>      adopt the naming scheme from Kamailio and prefix all of them with db_.
> 
> I agree.
> 
>>   4) Link modules that use db with one of the libraries.
> 
> 
>  5) create scripts that would automatically update a kamailio or ser
>  module for use with sip-router
> 
> 
> Andrei
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev