[Serdev] SUMMARY of: Loooong thread on SER who/what, architecture, design etc

[Martin Hoffmann]

Greger V. Teigre wrote:
> 
> Other improvements
> ============

Dunno, if this came up, but here is another suggestions: Better branch
handling.

What I mean is this: Instead of merely adding a URI to a set, I'd like
to be able to also give it a route name. Upon t_relay(), the route of
each branch is run and changes are applied for the message of this
branch only. For instance, if I add a header or mess with some, only the
message sent out on this branch is affected.

What I would like to have this for is PSTN routing. We have several
gateways and partners. For some of them I have to do some changes. If I
could just have one route for each destination and could use that route
independently of whether this is within a normal route or a failure
route (I cannot do this today since in the failure route I have to call
add_branch()) I could some way to set the primary, secondary, tertiary,
etc. destination for a certain prefix.

Regards,
Martin