[Serdev] SER as an extendable codebase/SIP stack - was: So who/what is SER for, anyway?

[Greger V. Teigre]

I kind of liked this discussion. I think the positions are clearer and 
that we more easily can agree to which patches should go into CVS.
g-)

Dragos Vingarzan wrote:
> Martin Hoffmann wrote:
>   
>> Dragos Vingarzan wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> And I have also realized why Martin is upset on my wave of change
>>> requests: I was using 0.10.99 for a looong time now.
>>>     
>>>       
>> I am only strongly objecting to one of your proposals: Dumbing SER down.
>> The rest, like having new functionality: go ahead.
>>   
>>     
> This one I object myself too :). I just wanted to lock the poison
> somehow better.
>
> Too much talk, not enough work. So I will get back to work and promise
> that next time that I am frustrated I will send a patch instead of a big
> mail ;-).
>
> -Dragos
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/attachments/20070130/ffe8d39d/attachment.htm