[Serdev] usrloc loading
Tim Barrett
timbarrett39 at hotmail.com
Mon Jan 29 21:50:53 UTC 2007
Please Help! I lost track of my password to unregister from this message
stream and it's killing my mailbox. Suggestions or pointers??+
>From: "Greger V. Teigre" <greger at teigre.com>
>To: Andreas Granig <andreas.granig at inode.info>
>CC: serdev at iptel.org
>Subject: Re: [Serdev] usrloc loading
>Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:31:25 +0100
>
>Thanks, Andreas.
>I have updated the page with your comments.
>g-)
>
>Andreas Granig wrote:
>>Greger V. Teigre wrote:
>>>Hi guys!
>>>I have taken the liberty to try to summarize your contributions, as well
>>>as add my 2 cents here:
>>>http://www.iptel.org/failover_redundancy_and_scalability_overview
>>
>>Great. Regarding your comment about NAT in the Pros of the second
>>approach: NAT-traversal can be achieved by using variation 2 in the list
>>(path-header). Since the path is stored in the location table, every proxy
>>can route the message via the right path.
>>
>>Additionally, you need a SIP loadbalancer which the NATed UAC communicates
>>with, and every proxy has to route calls towards the UAC via this lb
>>(using the path header). The lb of course has to be set up in a redundant
>>way (active/backup), but since it only relays SIP messages back and forth,
>>it can handle way more calls than the "work horses".
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Serdev mailing list
>Serdev at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
_________________________________________________________________
Get live scores and news about your team: Add the Live.com Football Page
http://www.live.com/?addtemplate=football
More information about the Serdev
mailing list