[Serdev] usrloc loading
Andreas Granig
andreas.granig at inode.info
Wed Jan 24 19:00:16 UTC 2007
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
> I prefer the first solution. Let's just say that we did not have
> a good experience with usrloc + db cluster from the performance point
> of view.
It needed some parameter tweaks in the cluster configuration to perform
reasonable, but once optimized, it does its job very well, especially in
terms of performance and availability.
For me the second solution seems to be easier to maintain and to
troubleshoot, because each node works on the same data, and no routing
between different proxy pairs has to be performed for on-net calls.
But again, I think it's more a matter of taste than a matter of which
works better than the other.
Andreas
More information about the Serdev
mailing list