[Serdev] usrloc loading

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Greger,

I'm sorry that my email upset you and please accept my apologies for that.

After all you posted a personal opinion about something (about OpenSER 
,in this case) and I asked if you could detail / explain this opinion. I 
think all subscribers have the right to be correctly informed on the 
matters discussed here, but I see you refuse my possibility to 
contribute on this :(.

BTW, as you are involved in the administration of the project, can you 
check what happens with my emails - they do not rich the list (even if 
I'm subscribed) :(

Thanks and regards,
Bogdan

Greger V. Teigre wrote:

> Hi Bogdan,
> This was an element in a discussion about ser, not openser. I'm not 
> interested in having a discussion about openser on serdev beyond 
> comparisons that may set ser in some perspective, and I find your 
> interruption quite tedious and self-centered. However, if you have 
> opinions about ser that are relevant to the discussion, you are 
> welcome to join.
>
> If you reread my post, you will see that my argument is that both ser 
> and openser make it too easy too create ser.cfgs that break the RFC. 
> Quite far from how you read it.
>
> Previous openser/ser discussions on serusers and serdev have not been 
> very fruitful, ex. the performance discussions. If you want a dialog 
> for the benefit of users or joint development work, feel free to make 
> a proposal, but please refrain from self-righteous posts on serusers 
> and serdev. You should allow SER users and developers to discuss ser 
> from all sorts of perspectives without disturbing with your agenda. 
> This is a privilege I believe the openser community enjoys on the 
> openser lists.
>
> Considering that your historical default response in discussions is to 
> state your opinion and then be silent, I assume this discussion is dead.
>
> Regards,
> Greger
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>
>> Hi Greger,
>>
>> OpenSER does not "pretend" to be everything to everybody, but tries 
>> as much as possible to respond to the user's feedback (reports, 
>> needs, etc).
>>
>> I know it is your HO, but can you be more specific (just list one or 
>> two cases maybe) where you think OpenSER breaks RFCs?? I always 
>> though that backing up with facts puts more strength in words.
>>
>> actually being RFC-compliant is one of the top requirements we have 
>> as project and a lot of effort was put in this direction (RFC3261 - 
>> correct via building, RFC3263 - complete algh implementation for 
>> server discovery, etc)
>>
>> regards,
>> bogdan
>>
>> Greger V. Teigre wrote:
>>
>>> :-) In fact, to me, OpenSER seems to pretend that it is all things 
>>> to all people. That may work for a while (and in fact, maybe we 
>>> should send some people to OpenSER...) IMHO, it seems that OpenSER 
>>> is going in the opposite direction of SER by introducing all sorts 
>>> of "special case" functionality that confuses people and allows them 
>>> to break more parts of the RFCs.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>