[Serdev] Bug SER-133

Greger V. Teigre greger at teigre.com
Sun Dec 10 08:39:21 UTC 2006


Oh, I see. When I see all the memory stuff, I just get lost in the 
output... :-)
Thanks,
g-)

Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
> For sure their shouldnt be a crash. But I do not see a crash.
> The debug messages look like normal message to me, when SER finds an error in 
> the configuration file and thus shuts down after parsing the config file. The 
> fellow just has set the debug level very high (to 9 ?), and as he did not set 
> the memdbg value high enough, so it is hard to see anything between all the 
> memory messages.
>
>   Nils
>
> On Sunday 10 December 2006 09:02, Greger V. Teigre wrote:
>   
>> Thanks for looking at it, Nils.
>> But shouldn't a regular warning be shown, not a crash?!
>> g-)
>>
>> Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
>>     
>>> Greger,
>>>
>>> the fifo support has been moved from the core to the fifo module. Thus
>>> the core in Ottendorf itself does not understand the fifo config
>>> parameters any more (I think).
>>> Their is already no fifo="/tmp/.." line any more in the default ser.cfg.
>>> But to reflact this move even more I'll remove all the other commented
>>> fifo config parameters to reduce the confusion.
>>>
>>>   Nils
>>>
>>> On Saturday 09 December 2006 20:59, Greger V. Teigre wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Could somebody have a quick look at the below bug report and determine
>>>> whether it is worth looking into or just close it?
>>>> http://tracker.iptel.org/browse/SER-133
>>>> g-)
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Serdev mailing list
>>>> Serdev at lists.iptel.org
>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
>>>>         
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/attachments/20061210/f247cd54/attachment.html


More information about the Serdev mailing list