[Serdev] Concept for a SIP cluster implementation

[Greger V. Teigre]

Now I'm sure I don't understand what you are talking about. :-)  Using path 
for load balancing has no client-requirements whatsoever.  And BTW, by now 
I'm not sure what kind of proposal you are talking about?!
g-)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Juha Heinanen" <jh at tutpro.com>
To: "Greger V. Teigre" <greger at teigre.com>
Cc: "Jan Janak" <jan at iptel.org>; <serdev at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Serdev] Concept for a SIP cluster implementation


> Greger V. Teigre writes:
>
> > It is my understanding that you would use path for REGISTER and
> > record route for other messages.
>
> in that case, i didn't understand your proposal.  anyway, path header is
> not supported by most SIP UAs, which would nullify its use here.  also,
> user must be able to make a call without first registering, which is
> another reason why what you propose doesn't work.
>
> -- juha
>