[Serdev] Concept for a SIP cluster implementation

[Greger V. Teigre]

Hi Juha,
Maybe I didn't understand the question the first time; if so, I still don't 
understand it... ;-)
It is my understanding that you would use path for REGISTER and record route 
for other messages.
g-)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Juha Heinanen" <jh at tutpro.com>
To: "Jan Janak" <jan at iptel.org>
Cc: "Greger V. Teigre" <greger at teigre.com>; <serdev at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Serdev] Concept for a SIP cluster implementation


> Jan Janak writes:
>
> >   Following 3GPP does not make much sense to me. In my opinion the 3GPP
> >   architecture does not solve any issues of real-world SIP setups, it
> >   can only work in walled gardens. In my opinion we should only make it
> >   work in the public internet where the adminstrators of SIP servers do
> >   not control the network. This is the most challenging environment.
> >   Everything else (such as walled gardens of mobile operators) is
> >   easier.
>
> i agree and already asked greger, why to use path header when the proxy
> that received the request and forwarded it to the other proxy (who
> "client" the called UA is) could simply record route the initial
> request.
>
> -- juha
>