[Serdev] Re: [Serusers] OpenSER release

[Atle Samuelsen]

I agree with the bugtracker solution, It maskes life easy'er for
everybody, you can then know what state the problem is in.



-Atle

Alle som snakker norsk, opp med hånden..


* Greger V. Teigre <greger at teigre.com> [050615 21:03]:
> I completely agree with you. I have been told that there was an attempt at 
> introducing a bug-tracking system earlier, but that it has been difficult. 
> Anyhow, in setting up policies and procedures around the experimental 
> directory, we have decided that usage of http://bugs.sip-router.org will be 
> mandatory.  Hopefully recent, better integration between the bug tracking 
> system and the CVS will make it more convenient to use also for other CVS 
> modules (however, I don't have a say there).
> g-)
> 
> Giudice, Salvatore wrote:
> >I am not an advocate for either ser or openser, but I would like to
> >comment.
> >
> >Is openser going to be equipped with a forum/ticket system where
> >people can document bugs, feature requests, etc (non-configuration
> >issues)?
> >
> >This is just my observation and you may not agree, but I believe this
> >project could be much better maintained if it used a more structured
> >ticketing style system to manage development issues instead of the
> >current mailing lists. In my experience, mailing lists like this
> >foster a terrible user experience where many development issues can
> >go on without response.
> >
> >Ideally, if there was a mailing list to address user issues and
> >ticketing system like the one Digium uses to manage Asterisk, I think
> >everyone would benefit by being better informed and ser would
> >ultimately be a better product for it. How many people out there feel
> >that their issues have fallen through the cracks in the past couple
> >years?
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:daniel at voice-system.ro]
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 4:28 AM
> >To: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
> >Cc: SER developer mailing list; serusers; users at openser.org;
> >devel at openser.org
> >Subject: Re: [Serusers] OpenSER release
> >
> >On 06/14/05 23:21, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
> >
> >>On Jun 14, 2005 at 22:48, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> ><daniel at voice-system.ro> wrote:
> >>
> >>[...]
> >>
> >>
> >>>It is your opinion, but I repeat myself, that the SER code
> >>>maintained by us will go further -- I don't think that someone can
> >>>claim that we didn't do the job for our code (the only discrepancy
> >>>is some last-minute adds in xlog (to print avps) - will be
> >>>committed on unstable very soon
> >
> >>>with the new color patch). The cvs was created just to ease the
> >>>maintainance. The patches would be a nightmare.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>Maybe I've misunderstood you: is this only a parallel "stabilized"
> >>version + some features or is it a full fork (do you intend to fork
> >>unstable also)?
> >>
> >>
> >It is fork for the code that we changed (acc module, usrloc module
> >...),
> >
> >in the future may be other that they do not find the path in SER. We
> >will maintain and upgrade our part of code from SER continuously.
> >
> >>I have no problem with another stable version, what worries me is
> >>fragmenting the development for unstable (which is the place where
> >>major changes are made).
> >>
> >>
> >I see no fragmenting there -- the situation is the same for SER as it
> >was before. For example, there is no fragment for acc module, it will
> >be
> >
> >maintained by who did it till now, adding what he considers necessary
> >there. But we came to meet a lot of requests of why the acc patch is
> >not
> >
> >included in the CVS (it was fully backward compatible and had new
> >features requested by many SER users) and we want to promote _more
> >open_
> >
> >approach to contributions to all parts of code. The acc patch was sent
> >on November 1, 2004. No real response (neither negative, nor positive)
> >from maintainer to the submission since then ... are you aware of a
> >good
> >
> >reason?!?! ... should we wait just about (or more) half an year for
> >each
> >
> >contribution?!? I will not do that anymore!!!
> >
> >Daniel
> >
> >>
> >>Andrei
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serdev mailing list
> serdev at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
>