[Serdev] contribution: SER module implementing Path extension(RFC 3327)

[Dragos Vingarzan]

Hi Juha and all,

I proposed to move the discussion about IMS on a separate list because
it gets more about IMS than ser. As long as it is about dev it's good to
be here, but when we argue about IMS specs it's better to move it away
because we're just making noise ;-).

I agree with you that ser will not be an operator grade IMS, but the
thing is that we could try and show them how it must be done :-P . And
also some operators preferr some more in-house development and you will
be amazed of how many of them are already using ser for IMS. Not
aknoledging this issue wouldn't make it go away.

Dragos


Juha Heinanen wrote:

>Klaus Darilion writes:
>
> > I'm also interested in IMS. 
>
>i'm not.  the reason is that ims uses sip to implement walled garden,
>which locks users to the operators and their artificial charging models,
>whose only purpose is to milk the cow as many times as possible.
>
>even if people manage to make ser ims compatible, it is unlikely that
>any mobile operator will start using ser as their ims.  the reason is
>that mobile operators have very strong ties with their network suppliers
>(nokia, ericsson, etc), which makes it very hard for them to include any
>third party components into their infrastructure.
>
>-- juha
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serdev mailing list
>serdev at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
>
>  
>

-- 
-----------------------------------------
Dipl. Eng. Dragos Vingarzan
FOKUS/NGNI
Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 31
10589 Berlin,Germany
Phone +49 (0)30 - 3463 - 7385
Mobile +49 (0)162 - 153 - 0154
eMail vingarzan at fokus.fraunhofer.de
Web www.fokus.fraunhofer.de
We could change the world if God will give us the source code...
-------------------------------------------------------