[Serdev] contribution: SER module implementing Path extension(RFC 3327)

[Klaus Darilion]

Hi!

I'm also interested in IMS. Further, the PATH extension is also quite 
useful for normal SIP setups as you can use it for NAT traversal with 
dumb outbound proxies. Thus, IMO serdev is right.

regards,
klaus

Greger V. Teigre wrote:
> Dragos Vingarzan wrote:
> 
>> Hi Fermin,
>>
>> I think we should move this on a different list, as it will go
>> off-topic. If there are more people interested in IMS I would suggest
>> to open a different email list, like ser-ims for example.
> 
> 
> Please do stay on the list for now, even though I haven't got much to 
> contribute on IMS, I find it of interest to see the challenges.  As long 
> as you are developing modules for ser, serdev is the appropriate list. 
> I'm sure the admins will move to split the list if the traffic gets too 
> high.
> g-)
> _______________________________________________
> Serdev mailing list
> serdev at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
> 
>