[Kamailio-Devel] Serious regressions in 1.5.0 dialog module - or just me?
abalashov at evaristesys.com
Wed Apr 8 14:42:47 CEST 2009
Yeah, I know. I just figured I was missing some of the erudite PV magic
in the fixup functions I was looking at, and that it is somehow able to
tell whether the parameter in the middle is optional or not via some
sort of crude scheme. Your interpretation confirms my suspicion that it
in fact cannot.
Henning Westerholt wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 April 2009, Alex Balashov wrote:
>>> The optional parameter should be always the last one(s), as its
>>> not possible to ommit a parameter from the middle of the given list.
>> That's what I thought too, and wondered how the config lexer and fixup
>> functions magically get around this problem.
> Normally there is not that much magic, its a simple array of parameters that
> get filled, and then the module fixup functions are called for each of them.
> sr_module.h: typedef int (*cmd_function)(struct sip_msg*, char*, char*, char*,
> char*, char*, char*);
> But i did not wrote this code, perhaps one of the authors can comment here
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (678) 237-1775
More information about the Devel