[Kamailio-Devel] dropping 200ok?

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 10/24/08 18:53, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> El Viernes, 24 de Octubre de 2008, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió:
>   
>> could protect. Is anyone seeing side effects or workarounds at least for
>> accounting? Have in mind that the INVITE might have been redirected, so
>> From/To headers might not be relevant for who should pay.
>>     
>
> Hi, what about the following case?
>
> INVITE
> 180
> restart
> CANCEL
>
> The CANCEL won't match a transaction, but it could be treated as an initial 
> INVITE (doing "loockup" against the RURI), but AFAIK nobody does it in the 
> config file.
>
>   
you can decide what to do with the CANCEL if there is not a matching 
INVITE transaction, use t_check_trans() from tm and then it is up to you 
waht to do in either of the cases. Default config in 1.4.x is dropping it.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com