[Kamailio-Devel] [ openser-Feature Requests-2159383 ] 'reply' function involving 'sl_reply' and 't_reply'

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

El Sábado, 11 de Octubre de 2008, Juha Heinanen escribió:
> Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
>  > So, for the user that configures Kamailio, having two functions
>  > "t_reply" and "sl_reply" doesn't offer any added value, it just forces
>  > him to be very careful of which one to use. So, why not a easier
>  > function "reply()"?
>
> yes, it sounds easier.  if there would be a function to check if a
> transaction exists, then reply() could be implemented by core or by a m4
> to be equivalent to this:
>
> if (transaction_exists()) {
>     t_reply(code, text);
> } else {
>     sl_reply(code, text);
> }

Yeah! :)


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo