[Kamailio-Devel] [Kamailio-Users] the sip router project

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Jiri,

Have you ever consider a fork as an option driven by technical needs?? Like to do something totally different than you have and than the other people want to do.

After 7 year of SER/OpenSER I (and many other) got to simplest conclusion that the current design is not able to sustain the progress 
of SER / OpenSER (like scripting, async calls, integration, scaling, etc) ? Mainly because SER was design 7 years ago when there was only 
stateless processing, no TCP, etc....

And I personally do not see any future in keep trying to patch the existing design as it has no future. If SER and kamilio want to go on 
this path, fine with me, not my problem, happy for your joined effort.

But not point in black the idea of somebody forking into a different direction than yours - nature invented forking for seeking new alternatives!

I like the go for new alternatives instead of blocking into a dead-end.

Regards,
Bogdan



Jiri Kuthan wrote:
>
> "Serial forking" is not the kind of business I'm interested here at all.
> In fact, I think forking is a VERY BAD THING to do and I'm very strongly
> opposed to attempts discouraging unforking and encouraging other forks.
> More funded opinions than mine can be for example found here:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fork_%28software_development%29
>
> Therefore thanks again to anyone putting effort on unforking!