[OpenSER-Devel] [Serdev] Possible bug in the tm module in the presence of packet loss/branches

[Dan Pascu]

On Thursday 13 March 2008, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Dan Pascu writes:
>  > I'm sure there is more than one way to do this. The NACK sounds the
>  > simplest and least disruptive of all the ideas mentioned so far.
>
> anything that requires changes in SIP UAs is a very long term solution.

That is very obvious. Not only it can take a long time to get a consensus 
on a solution, it would take even longer to get it implemented in UAs.

> in practice, we only have power to affect on how openser proxy is
> behaving.

Do you have any suggestion how can this be at least addressed, if not 
solved, using the current RFC framework?

-- 
Dan