[OpenSER-Devel] location issues

[Klaus Darilion]

Hi!

A Contact URI without username is valid and useful.

An AoR (To URI of REGISTER) without username may be syntactical valid, 
but the meaning is AFAIK not defined. Thus IMO it should be rejected 
(regardless of the domain=.. setting)

klaus

Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
> El Friday 27 June 2008 13:08:05 Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió:
>> On 06/27/08 12:41, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>> El Friday 27 June 2008 09:21:13 Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió:
>>>> On 06/26/08 16:44, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>>>> Is it useful to have an AoR without username?
>>>> I don't need it personally. It is why I asked.
>>> It's completely valid in RFC 3261, but probably 100% useless in real
>>> life.
>> Having an AoR with just domain or having location records for domain only?
>>
>> Do you have direct references?
> 
> Yes true, there are different thing.
> 
> Well I just mean that RFC 3261 allows registration for AoR with no username:
> 
>   10.2 Constructing the REGISTER Request
> 
>       To: The To header field contains the address of record whose
>            registration is to be created, queried, or modified.  The To
>            header field and the Request-URI field typically differ, as
>            the former contains a user name.  This address-of-record MUST
>            be a SIP URI or SIPS URI.
> 
> The above allows "To" header with no username, but sincerely I expect it never 
> occurs so IMHO OpenSer could drop it.
> 
> 
> About location records with no username it's also valid:
> 
>    The Contact header field values of the request typically consist of
>    SIP or SIPS URIs that identify particular SIP endpoints (for example,
>    "sip:carol at cube2214a.chicago.com"), but they MAY use any URI scheme.
>    A SIP UA can choose to register telephone numbers (with the tel URL,
>    RFC 2806 [9]) or email addresses (with a mailto URL, RFC 2368 [32])
>    as Contacts for an address-of-record, for example.
> 
> In this point I can't understand if there is any problem when the Contact is 
> just a domain. It there? You said:
> 
>> However, when loading the records, usrloc 
>> module discards the records with empty username or use_domain=1 and 
>> empty domain.
> 
> Why records with no username are discarded? do you mean record with no 
> username in the "Contact" field? or records with no username in "username" 
> field?
> 
> Regards.
> 
> 
> 
>