[OpenSER-Devel] [ openser-Feature Requests-1682404 ] configurable server architecture

[SourceForge.net]

Feature Requests item #1682404, was opened at 2007-03-16 21:00
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by elfring
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743023&aid=1682404&group_id=139143

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: modules
Group: ver devel
Status: Open
Resolution: Later
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Markus Elfring (elfring)
Assigned to: Henning Westerholt (henningw)
Summary: configurable server architecture

Initial Comment:
Would you like to consider current design options to increase the speed and scalability of the server implementation?
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_pool_pattern
2. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/en/mod/worker.html
3. http://haproxy.1wt.eu/#perf
4. http://kegel.com/c10k.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Markus Elfring (elfring)
Date: 2008-06-13 10:20

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=572001
Originator: YES

Would you like to benefit from a mixture of multi-processing and
multi-threading?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2008-06-13 10:15

Message:
Logged In: NO 

Could it be that you have no clue what you are talking about? Openser does
not use threads.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Markus Elfring (elfring)
Date: 2008-06-13 09:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=572001
Originator: YES

Would you like to support designs for the server architecture that are
more powerful than creating threads for each request?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Henning Westerholt (henningw)
Date: 2008-06-12 16:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=337916
Originator: NO

This would be a good thing, for sure. But this report provides no real
useful informations, closes as invalid.

Henning

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743023&aid=1682404&group_id=139143