[Devel] [ openser-Bugs-1459668 ] advertised_address does not change record-route header

SourceForge.net noreply at sourceforge.net
Fri Mar 16 13:33:17 CET 2007


Bugs item #1459668, was opened at 2006-03-27 22:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by henningw
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1459668&group_id=139143

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: core
Group: ver 1.0.x
Status: Open
Resolution: Later
Priority: 2
Private: No
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: advertised_address does not change record-route header

Initial Comment:
 Setting the advertised_address and advertised_port to
a particular value in openser 1.0.1 :

should change VIA header, and other destination lumps
(e.g. Record-Route header).

In fact -when used- it actually ONLY changes the VIA
header and NOT the Record-Route header. This causes
calls to fail, since subsequent requests in the dialog
refer to the wrong (local 192.168.8.111) URI being
displayed in the original RR header

situation:
OPENSER 1.0.1 behind NAT -router, 
advertised_address and advertised_port set to:
advertised_address="xxx.dyndns.biz"
advertised_port=5060

client C1 on internet
client c2 on internet
Session Initiation Protocol
    Request-Line: INVITE sip:033 at 62.59.29.45 SIP/2.0
        Method: INVITE
        Resent Packet: False
    Message Header
        Record-Route:
<sip:192.168.8.111;ftag=482549029;lr=on>
        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
xxx.dyndns.biz:5060;branch=z9hG4bKd80f.eab49d74.0
        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
82.172.243.124:63586;received=192.168.8.111;rport=5062;branch=z9hG4bK7B021435F6723737AFF00EDDB84BECD5
        From: x
<sip:stefan at kubuntu.mydomain.org:5062>;tag=482549029
            SIP Display info: x 
            SIP from address:
sip:stefan at kubuntu.mydomain.org:5062
            SIP tag: 482549029


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Henning Westerholt (henningw)
Date: 2007-03-16 12:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=337916
Originator: NO

This bug is soon one year old. 
Is this report still valid for 1.2?



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1459668&group_id=139143



More information about the Devel mailing list