[Devel] failure route and lcr (non standard routing/scenario)

[Ovidiu Sas]

Hi Juha,

I need to manually set the ruri_user_avp because next_gws() will set
the avp _only_ from REQUEST_ROUTE.
Since I didn't called the next_gws() function from the REQUEST_ROUTE,
the avp is not there.  Being in a FAILURE_ROUTE, the avp is _only_
checked and an error probe is printed out.  That's why I manually set
the ruri_user_avp.

And seems to work ok, except that I have an issue with the RURI that
is set on the outgoing INVITE due to a wrong length for the param:

params=<transport=udp>(16)

(16) should be (13)

I'm not familiar with the parser and that's why I asked here.
Maybe I'm the only one trying this scenario ...



Regards,
Ovidiu Sas

On 3/14/07, Juha Heinanen <jh at tutpro.com> wrote:
> Ovidiu Sas writes:
>
>  > In the failure route, lcr is used to route the call via the gws, but
>  > because Icr is invoked first time in a failure route, we need to
>  > manually set the ruri_user_avp.
>
> load_gws() is setting gw_uri_avp and next_gws() is setting
> ruri_user_avp.
>
> -- juha
>
>