[Users] Re: [Devel] name for branch 1.2.x

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

another question :-) ,

so shall we rename the old branches and tags to reflect the new naming 
schema?

Cheers,
Daniel


On 03/12/07 12:06, Henning Westerholt wrote:
> Am Montag, 12. März 2007 11:01 schrieb Klaus Darilion:
>   
>> This is also how asterisk does it and I'm fine with it. IMO it makes
>> sense to not have a "patch version number" in the branch name.
>>
>> btw: why not using "." instead of "_", e.g.
>>
>> Nevertheless we should also have tags for each release.
>>     
>
> As tags and branches are simply cheap copies in subversion, i second this 
> option. 
>
> 1.2 for the branch, 1.2.0 - 1.2.N for the release tags.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Henning
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>