[OpenSER-Devel] Request for comments: new routing module

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 07/31/07 19:10, Dan Pascu wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 July 2007, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>   
>> On Tuesday 31 July 2007, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>     
>>> Thus, for me it is ok if it is included to openser.
>>>       
>> Ok, do you have a suggesting for a name? Perhaps "route" as module
>> name, and prefix the functions with "r_"?
>>     
>
> "routing" as module name sounds better IMO.
>   
I had no time to review the description of the module, however, for me, 
using this kind of name related to route/routing will introduce 
confusions discussing and referring configuration file (we have "route" 
blocks, we refer a lot to "routing" logic), perhaps a name that should 
make clear a difference would be much better -- just my opinion (e.g., 
sprouting, as I understand already has similar name).

Daniel

>
>