[Devel] SF.net SVN: openser: [2108] trunk/modules/dialog

Jerome Martin jmartin at longphone.fr
Mon Apr 30 23:06:16 CEST 2007


Nice one, I remember a heated discussion about that, I'm glad that now
everyone can consider OpenSER more RFC-compliant and foolproof when
needed :-)

Any idea about the cost of using tight-matching though ? Just being
curious there ... (I'll probably evaluate this myself, but I'd like to
have your POV).

On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 13:29 -0700, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Revision: 2108
>           http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=2108&view=rev
> Author:   bogdan_iancu
> Date:     2007-04-30 13:29:36 -0700 (Mon, 30 Apr 2007)
> 
> Log Message:
> -----------
> - dialog matching can be done also via SIP elements (in addition to 
>   dialog ID via RR cokie) - based on a patch from 
>   Michel Bensoussan <michel at extricom.com>
>   Closes patch submision 1692747.
> 
> - new module parameter - dlg_match_mode for controlling how the matching
>   of sequential requests is done:
>   	1) only based on DID
> 	2) based on DID with fallback to SIP elements
> 	3) no DID, only SIP elements
> 
> - "use_tight_match" (for DID-based matching) includes FROM and TO tag
>   checking along callid.
> 
> Modified Paths:
> --------------
>     trunk/modules/dialog/README
>     trunk/modules/dialog/dialog.c
>     trunk/modules/dialog/dlg_handlers.c
>     trunk/modules/dialog/dlg_handlers.h
>     trunk/modules/dialog/dlg_hash.c
>     trunk/modules/dialog/dlg_hash.h
>     trunk/modules/dialog/doc/dialog_user.sgml
> 
> 
> This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel




More information about the Devel mailing list