[Devel] Re: [Users] Request for discussion: FIFO to MI migration
jh at tutpro.com
Tue Oct 10 12:02:12 CEST 2006
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
> As the number of affected function is really small, my suggestion is to
> have a small unixsock/fifo proxy to translate from old version to new
> one (in case if we do not find a nicer way to ensure compat with serweb
> and sems).
the proxy is fine as long as it is part of sems and not a separate
process like fifo_server is. perhaps a filter would be a better term.
in case of sems, also sip replies need to get there.
i'm not worried about serweb compatibility, because there is
corresponding openser application in the works.
More information about the Devel