[Devel] [Users] Request for discussion: FIFO to MI migration
Juha Heinanen
jh at tutpro.com
Thu Oct 5 22:01:43 CEST 2006
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
> 2) for how long should we keep in parallel the two FIFO / UNIXSOCK
> implementations before dropping the old ones? I am a fan of a fast
> transition I would drop the old impls as soon as the new one offer the
> same functioanlity - this will accelerate the testing and migration
> process.
since 1.1.2 will bring quite a lot of changes anyway, perhaps we could
drop the old ones immediately. we need to bite the bullet at some time
anyway.
> So the questions are - when to drop the old impls and how to deal with
> backward compatibilities (as MI will not be 100% compat with SEMS for
> example)
since sems compatibility is very important and since we cannot change
sems's socket interface, we have to provide backwards compatibility to
it via tm module. i can be limited to unix socket only.
-- juha
More information about the Devel
mailing list