[Devel] Extended nathelper

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

the idea is to keep the think as compact and consistent as possible - 
there are more easier to use :D

I will take care of it.

regards,
bogdan

Walter Schober wrote:

>Sure! If the outcome is the same, that would do it also!
>And it's more controllable in the script.
>
>P.S.: I was happy that it worked at all, that I didn't look for a better
>solution :-) 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro] 
>Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 5:08 PM
>To: Walter Schober
>Cc: devel at openser.org
>Subject: Re: [Devel] Extended nathelper
>
>Hi,
>
>in this case shouldn't be simpler just to add an parameter to 
>add_rvc_param() to tell if the received should be added as URI param or 
>header param?
>
>will this cover your scenario?
>
>regards,
>Bogdan
>  
>