[Devel] is_domain_local

[Klaus Darilion]

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> My opinion is that the functions should take as parameter an URI and not 
> just the domain. Normally the script handles SIP uris and not just 
> domain name, so has no sense to start extending the pvs to just for this 
> purpose.
> The function should properly parse the received URI and to extract the 
> domain.

What is the allowed URI? name-addr or addr-spec? Maybe a generic 
function which parses name-addr into addr-spec might be useful.

Then would could have another function which parses SIP URIs into user, 
domain and parameters, and another function which parses tel URIs into 
number, paramters and phone-context.

regards
klaus

> regards,
> bogdan
> 
> Juha Heinanen wrote:
> 
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
>>
>> > in this case, we can replaced everything with the 
>> is_domain_local(pv) > function, right?
>>
>> yes, if pv contains just the host part of the uri.  perhaps also
>> is_uri_user_e164 should then be replaced by is_user_e164(pv) and add new
>> pvs if necessary, since now there doesn't exist a host part pv for each
>> uri pv.  for example, there is $re that contains refer-to uri, but
>> there is no pv that would contain host part of refer-to uri.
>>
>> -- juha
>>  
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel